On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: McDowell, Brett [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 11:13 AM >> To: Murray S. Kucherawy >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. >> cousin domain) >> >> I'm surprised to see this level of misunderstanding on this mail list >> between experts in this space. Is there already a BCP from IETF >> regarding DKIM key management with/for 3rd-party senders? If not IETF, >> anywhere else? If not, we probably should put one together. > > The idea of a BCP presupposes enough experience with the material in practice > to have something to say about it. I don't think we're even half way there > on this topic, or on the topic of DKIM policy in general. > > Limitations of the current email infrastructure coupled with myriad mail > rewriting and relaying practices, all with some level of sound technical > backing, make identifying the "B" in "BCP" a challenge.
I actually thought there was a fair degree of deployments where some ESP's DKIM-sign mail on behalf of their clients, by means of key management much as you outlined above. No? _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
