On 7/6/12 4:46 PM, "Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Friday, July 06, 2012 11:28:17 PM Franck Martin wrote: >> May be I can clarify >> >> SPF tests have to pass first on their own merit, so we are not changing >> anything. It still applies to the Mail From envelope. What DMARC adds is >> alignment between the domains in the mail from: and From: combined with >> the DKIM pass and alignment we get if DMARC pass or not. >> >> So DMARC do use SPF. > >If you want to put it that way, then that makes it even clearer that >DMARC is >not a replacement for SPF policy. Call it what you want, just don't >force >people into choosing between the feedback mechanism in DMARC (which I >really >like) and existing policy mechanisms that might say something stronger. > I understand SPF is doing rounds in IETF, you could suggest there a feedback mechanism to the protocolŠ We don't force anyone to adopt DMARC, we are even saying it is not for everyone, but point taken to may be alert more if people have a current spf -all or adsp and want to move to dmarc. It could be clearer that p=none in that cases may change disposition. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
