On 07/24/2012 01:59 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Thanks for testing. It turns out you have to use all the letters in
the variable name and not just most of them :-) Fixed.
Happy to help. Understand that the following is offered solely to help
make the page more useful.
The form will happily allow me to select both "iodef" and "afrf" -- I
need to go check the spec, but off the to of my head I suspect
"rf=afrf,iodef" isn't supported...
I suggest you consider a little logic to omit the "rf=" tag when there's
no "ruf=" present. Same behavior whether "iodef" or "afrf" is selected,
or both together per above.
The values given for "rua" and "ruf" must be single addresses.
Separating with commas, spaces, or a combination of the two doesn't work.
There's no detection of URIs entered into the "rua" or "ruf" fields. Any
string has "mailto:"; prepended, regardless of content.
v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailto:[email protected];
ruf=mailto:mailto:[email protected]; adkim=r; aspf=r; sp=reject
v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:http://dmarc.crash.com/aggreport.php;
ruf=mailto:http://dmarc.crash.com/rufreport.php; adkim=s; aspf=r;
sp=reject
When an option is the default behavior you mention it on the form, which
I like. If they click it you include it, which is no problem. Just
tempting to either omit or warn the user that it's wasting space they
may need in the record if they have a lot of or especially long rua or
ruf URIs.
You might consider not setting the "ri=" value lower than 3600. Most
sites aren't going to honor anything below 86,400, which you might
mention on the form in addition to it being the default, but anybody who
does may view sub-hourly intervals as a nuisance.
Hope this helps,
--Steve.
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
