The current spec text allows "rf=iodef,afrf". What it doesn't say is whether you would send to the first of those that you support, or all of the ones you support. That's a doc bug we should fix in –03.
-MSK From: Steven M Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Organization: Crash Computing, Inc Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:16:53 -0700 To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC Record Assistant On 07/24/2012 01:59 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: Thanks for testing. It turns out you have to use all the letters in the variable name and not just most of them :-) Fixed. Happy to help. Understand that the following is offered solely to help make the page more useful. The form will happily allow me to select both "iodef" and "afrf" -- I need to go check the spec, but off the to of my head I suspect "rf=afrf,iodef" isn't supported... I suggest you consider a little logic to omit the "rf=" tag when there's no "ruf=" present. Same behavior whether "iodef" or "afrf" is selected, or both together per above. The values given for "rua" and "ruf" must be single addresses. Separating with commas, spaces, or a combination of the two doesn't work. There's no detection of URIs entered into the "rua" or "ruf" fields. Any string has "mailto:"; prepended, regardless of content. v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:mailto:[email protected]; adkim=r; aspf=r; sp=reject v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:http://dmarc.crash.com/aggreport.php; ruf=mailto:http://dmarc.crash.com/rufreport.php; adkim=s; aspf=r; sp=reject When an option is the default behavior you mention it on the form, which I like. If they click it you include it, which is no problem. Just tempting to either omit or warn the user that it's wasting space they may need in the record if they have a lot of or especially long rua or ruf URIs. You might consider not setting the "ri=" value lower than 3600. Most sites aren't going to honor anything below 86,400, which you might mention on the form in addition to it being the default, but anybody who does may view sub-hourly intervals as a nuisance. Hope this helps, --Steve. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
