>MAIL FROM: <[email protected]> > >DKIM-Signature: v=1; ...; d=example.com; ... >From: [email protected] >Date: Fri, Feb 15 2002 16:54:30 -0800 >To: [email protected] >Subject: here's a sample > >Clearly, the SPF identifier is not in alignment. However, am I correct >in understanding that this would still pass the DMARC check, as long as >the DKIM signature (which is in alignment) validates?
Yes. >Assuming that's correct, would this be considered an acceptable >practice? I've looked at the FAQ question on third-party senders, and I >think what I'm describing corresponds to the suggestion A.2 there. Sure. That's the point of checking both. >Has anyone suggested allowing the DMARC record to specify acceptable >third-party domains for the RFC5321.MailFrom? Please, no. SPF does what it does. There is no need to make both SPF and DKIM match. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
