The intrinsic error rate of the SPF technology is way lower than the error rate of DKIM. The computation is way more complex for DKIM and because of the DMARC reports we are discovering bugs in DKIM libraries.
I would agree that DKIM is somewhat harder to debug, but I wouldn't say its "intrinsic error rate" is lower. They're different. DKIM survives a variety of common forwarding setups, e.g., alumni or professional association courtesy addresses, that SPF doesn't.
Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY "I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
