No, this is not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about bugs in the implementation of the DKIM algorithm. This is a complex algorithm, SPF is more simple to code.
And yes DKIM is more resilient in forwarding than SPF. On 12/11/12 1:32 PM, "John R Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: >> The intrinsic error rate of the SPF technology is way lower than the >>error >> rate of DKIM. The computation is way more complex for DKIM and because >>of >> the DMARC reports we are discovering bugs in DKIM libraries. > >I would agree that DKIM is somewhat harder to debug, but I wouldn't say >its >"intrinsic error rate" is lower. They're different. DKIM survives a >variety >of common forwarding setups, e.g., alumni or professional association >courtesy addresses, that SPF doesn't. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
