In article <[email protected]> you write: >am I alone feeling we might have a use for some "fine-tuning" options to >"filter" the kind of failure report one wishes to receive (and cooperating >receivers wish to generate) for RUF destination(s)?
Since reporters are doing us a big favor by sending reports in the first place, I think it would be a better idea just to do whatever editing you need to do on the messages they send rather than asking them to add extra code at their end. Personally, I want them all, even though the vast majority are not actionable. You never know what you might later want to go back and check. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
