On Dec 12, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Davide Migliavacca <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand the added complexity in the implementation, but that's a > one-time investment, while continued consumption of computing, storage and > bandwidth resources it's a operating cost that might become significant in > the long run and usually end up high in the list of costs to be cut. > > Of course, I see that a receiver may simply elect to stop (or never start) > sending the reports, but that's exactly what we (senders) most definitely > don't want to happen.
Hi Davide, Can you offer up some suggestions on how what sort of controls you think would be useful? Then we all should have something to point our flamethrowers at! :-P =- Tim _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
