However they waived all of that by just being here:
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
My conservative assumption is that if someone doesn't have sufficent
authority at his organization to remove boilerplate threats, he certainly
doesn't have sufficient authority to agree on his organization's behalf to
Note Well or anything else.
Really, the safest thing is to discard such mail unread. If they don't
want us to do that, why put on the threat in the first place?
On 1/10/13 12:51 PM, "John Levine" <[email protected]> wrote:
If you are not [email protected] you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or
taking action in reliance of the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Since none of us are, as far as I can tell "[email protected]" I
would strongly advice not reading or responding to this threatening
message.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
