Then this person is personally liable to go against his/her company policy?
Let direct the threat in the right direction :P I suggest we unsubscribe this person from the mailing list to protect this group. On 1/10/13 1:55 PM, "John R Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: >> However they waived all of that by just being here: >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > >My conservative assumption is that if someone doesn't have sufficent >authority at his organization to remove boilerplate threats, he certainly >doesn't have sufficient authority to agree on his organization's behalf >to >Note Well or anything else. > >Really, the safest thing is to discard such mail unread. If they don't >want us to do that, why put on the threat in the first place? _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
