John Wilson wrote: > J., > > 1. Yes, you are correct. > 2. Yes, you are correct...the message will be rejected. > 3. Yes...if your envelope-from domain has no SPF record, that is considered > an SPF-fail for DMARC purposes. > 4. Yes, you are correct: all unsigned messages lacking an SPF record for the > envelope-from domain will be rejected based on your DMARC record of > "v=DMARC1;p=reject" UNLESS the receiving ISP decides to override your policy. >
Ok, so where in the DMARC draft specification is it stated that SPF-absence equals a result of DMARC-fail for the SPF-mechanism? Also, I find it troubling that DMARC leverages SPF and at the same time changes the RFC-sanctioned SPF semantics (i.e., the old SPF-neutral now becomes SPF-fail for DMARC). -J. Gomez. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
