>Ok, so where in the DMARC draft specification is it stated that SPF-absence >equals a result of >DMARC-fail for the SPF-mechanism? > >Also, I find it troubling that DMARC leverages SPF and at the same time >changes the >RFC-sanctioned SPF semantics (i.e., the old SPF-neutral now becomes SPF-fail >for DMARC).
The only situation in that would be an issue is if a domain went to the effort of publishing a DMARC record, but did not publish an SPF record. As the old saying goes, "Doctor, it hurts when I do this." "So don't do that." R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
