>>I'm not checking DMARC, but wouldn't this mail be rejected according to >>your DMARC policy if I were? (I'd presume not, or you wouldn't have set >>things up this way, but what am I missing?) >> > >http://www.dmarc.org/faq.html#r_2 >http://www.dmarc.org/faq.html#s_3 >https://code.launchpad.net/~mlm-author/mailman/2.1-author > >Don't forget as a receiver you can always overwrite the DMARC disposition >for stuff you strongly care about.
I take it that you're agreeing that Linkedin's DMARC is wrong, and receivers should add special case code to ignore it if they want mail you send to mailing lists. To put it mildly, that doesn't scale very well. R's, John PS: I'm ignoring the ridiculous suggestions that every mailing list in the world should change their existing working code to circumvent DMARC mistakes. We didn't do it for SPF/SRS, we didn't do it for DKIM or ADSP, and we're certainly not going to do it now. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
