On Saturday, March 30, 2013 8:11 AM [GMT+1=CET],Franck Martin wrote: > In practice, contrary to popular belief, I don't have much issues in > mailing lists, and I subscribe to a lot. (...) > > So while in theory this can be problematic for a domain with > p=reject, in practice it can be quite minor.
Perhaps you don't have much issues with mailing lists because DMARC is very new and not yet widely implemented by the community at large? Because I think that if DMARC was widely implemented, you would have a lot of trouble with mailing lists. I hope some solution to this problem with mailing lists is found. Maybe mailing list software should evolve and take ownership of the RFC5322.From header and put in there the list's own email address while retaining the original poster's descriptive name? Regards, J. Gomez _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
