On Saturday, March 30, 2013 12:14 AM [GMT+1=CET],Dave Crocker wrote: > On 3/29/2013 2:17 PM, John Levine wrote: > > Glad to hear it. In that case, could someone please take them out > > of the FAQ? > > > > http://www.dmarc.org/faq.html#s_3 > > > Sorry, no. The faq entry you cite does not make the claim or give the > directive you cite. Please reread the question asked. > > It is cast as a question from an operator who wants to play in the > DMARC sandbox. That's quite different from asserting a broad mandate > for all operators. > > That is, it /does/ give guidance to mailing list operators that choose > to participate in DMARC.
While good, in my opinion that's not enough. That FAQ entry should also discuss at some length (even with examples) why or why not a mailing list operator may choose to participate in DMARC, i.e., give a proper caveat, as it happens to be a known problem. Regards, J. Gomez _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
