On Monday, April 01, 2013 11:49:25 PM J. Gomez wrote: > On Monday, April 01, 2013 11:14 PM [GMT+1=CET],Steve Atkins wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2013, at 12:43 PM, "J. Gomez" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > (As you top-post, I'll do it too.) > > > > > > I want to use DMARC as a sender to explicitly convey policy to the > > > receiver regarding what to do when they get email which purports to > > > be from my domains and which is not signed with DKIM, or which > > > carries an invalid DKIM signature. > > > > It's not terribly clear what your goals are with DMARC. > > > > Do you have an actual requirement by a real company with actual > > recipients, a significant email volume and a potential for being a > > target of phishing attacks which could conceivably be mitigated by > > DMARC, or are you just expressing an academic interest in DMARC as a > > hobbyist / interested bystander? > > > > If the former, can you give some more concrete details of what > > problem you believe you have that you think DMARC can help mitigate? > > I am not allowed to disclose company problems in a public mailing list. I do > have a significant number of users, and phishing attacks while low are a > constant threat. > > My goal with DMARC is to have an additional tool to make email more > trustworthy for my users, in the way stated in my above quoted paragraph.
Surely you can describe your use case in general terms? If not, I'm pretty confident that "I have this problem that I can't describe, but this is the solution" will not get you far. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
