On Friday, March 29, 2013 10:19 PM [GMT+1=CET],John Levine wrote: > > "v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100" > > > > I think this means that DMARC when using a "reject" policy breaks > > mailing lists. And that is ugly. > > I hope this doesn't come as news to anyone.
It's news to me. Not everyone is born learned. > We've been saying since approximately forever that domains that have > human users are not good candidates for DMARC policy statements. > Collecting the statistics is fine, of course, give or take the data > leakage issues. Define "We". That is not what is said in dmarc.org. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
