It is clearly explained at: http://www.dmarc.org/faq.html#r_2
What mailing lists do to emails with a DMARC policy. You may want to read: http://engineering.linkedin.com/email/dmarc-new-tool-detect-genuine-emails I think it could be better than trying to put all the pieces together. On 3/29/13 2:47 PM, "J. Gomez" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Friday, March 29, 2013 10:19 PM [GMT+1=CET],John Levine wrote: > >> > "v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100" >> > >> > I think this means that DMARC when using a "reject" policy breaks >> > mailing lists. And that is ugly. >> >> I hope this doesn't come as news to anyone. > >It's news to me. Not everyone is born learned. > >> We've been saying since approximately forever that domains that have >> human users are not good candidates for DMARC policy statements. >> Collecting the statistics is fine, of course, give or take the data >> leakage issues. > >Define "We". That is not what is said in dmarc.org. > >_______________________________________________ >dmarc-discuss mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > >NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
