Two (and a half) separate issues.
Al is correct; the sending domain would be wiser not to put p=reject for this
domain.
This is independent of the fact that gmail 1) decided not to apply DMARC to it
because they are nice to mailing lists and 2) decided to put it into the spam
folder for some non-DMARC reason.
Elizabeth
On Apr 5, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Christine Borgia wrote:
> Olga said that dis=none (disposition=none) -- means that Gmail applied "none"
> policy instead of "reject". A "none" policy wouldn't cause mail to be spam
> foldered, would it?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Al Iverson
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 10:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header
>
> Apologies if I'm beating this to death, but here's another example of a
> domain with active users participating in mailing lists, yet they have a
> reject policy in place. This mail is going to my spam folder at Gmail as a
> result: dmarc=fail (p=REJECT dis=none) d=junc.eu
>
> Might be wiser to not put p=reject for this domain.
>
> Regards,
> Al Iverson
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
> (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
