On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: >>So if the INTENT is for Gmail to not ding those messages for a DMARC >>policy-related reason, then perhaps somebody might want to look >>closer, because it smells like a bug. > > Doesn't sound like a bug to me. If people publish a DMARC policy that > says the mail they send is spam, who are we to disagree?
You're confusing two different things. I said Gmail's intent, not the sender's intent. I was not questioning which was wiser, only the implementation relating to a choice. Regards, Al Iverson -- Al Iverson | Chicago, IL | (312) 725-0130 Twitter: @aliverson / www.spamresource.com _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
