Nic Bernstein skrev den 2013-08-16 22:43:
Anyone have any thoughts? It seems as though the milters are getting the message before the policy daemon, and yet the logs would appear to say otherwise (and they should get it after).
opendmarc use its own spf checks, it does not trust pypolicyd-spf results, better results depends on make opendmarc api to create a spf check as replacement for pypolicyd-spf, one milter lib, one policy
reduce code size, reduce ram, and in end speedup mail flow, hopefull it will be done, eg make opendkim user api in opendmarc, then make openspf milter based on opendmarc api, or make it all into dmarc, so mta just use one milter for testing forgies
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
