John Levine skrev den 2013-08-29 23:31:
opendmarc use its own spf checks, it does not trust pypolicyd-spf
results, better results depends on make opendmarc api to create a
spf
check as replacement for pypolicyd-spf, one milter lib, one policy
This is absolutely incorrect.
opendmarc uses the SPF checks you tell it to use. You give it the
SPF
and DKIM results, it gives you the dmarc results. It doesn't have
any
SPF checks built in.
In the plugin I wrote for mailfront, I used libspf2, but I could have
used any SPF library I wanted.
is forged headers trusted ?
do we waste time with dmarc ?
do dkim waste time ?
does spf waste time ?
is there a better world somewhere ?
i give up
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
