We have been doing it for a while now see: https://gitli.corp.linkedin.com/lafayette
and been pushing for a while for people to do so It reminds me, when we tried to get internet in Fiji, the result of the discussions was to first do a survey to know if Internet would be of any value. Needless to say we lost 5 years in adoption, and in Internet time this is a lot. On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Todd Herr <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings. > > I apologize if you're not a member of M3AAWG, but I'm casting a wide net for > an upcoming M3AAWG activity. > > > At the 29th M3AAWG meeting in Montreal, one of the open roundtable sessions > spawned the idea of M3AAWG conducting an experiment to see if there's value > in DMARC Aggregate reports. Specifically, if a brand owner receives DMARC > aggregate reports about an IP engaged in fraudulent activity, might the brand > owner be able to forward those reports to the entity responsible for the IP > address (hosting provider, network owner, ISP, etc.) and will there be any > action taken based on these reports? > > I have a PDF document to share that gives an deeper overview of the > experiment, and there will be a BoF on Wednesday February 19th at the meeting > in San Francisco, but I'm hoping to start gathering volunteers now prior to > the meeting, so that we may have some momentum going in. The document is not > necessarily a finished product, but it's more than a rough draft; that is to > say, changes may occur between now and San Francisco, but they're not likely > to be significant. If you're interested and can commit your organization to > participating, please contact me off-list, either here or at my work address, > [email protected]. > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
