Thanks for the link, Franck.

To be clear, the experiment in question isn't focused on the method(s) used
for receiving, collating, and perhaps further passing along DMARC aggregate
reports, although any tools that can help in this regard are doubtless
useful.  What we're trying to learn from this experiment is essentially
whether or not an abuse desk will take action when presented with an
aggregate report, especially if that report is coming from a third party.

Here's an example...

- $BRAND authenticates its outbound mail and publishes a DMARC policy.

- $BRAND is a target of a spoof attack originating from $IP_ADDRESS, and so
$BRAND receives one or more aggregate reports about the attack from one or
more sources.

- $BRAND collates those reports, and notes that $IP_ADDRESS is the
responsibility of abuse@WeProvideConnectivity.

- $BRAND sends a report to abuse@WeProvideConnectivity showing that it
received X reports about $IP_ADDRESS, totaling Y authentication failures.

- abuse@WeProvideConnectivity receives the report, and does something with
it, which may include ignore it, ask for headers, dig into logs, kill it
with fire, etc.

The main data point we want to gather from the  experiment is what
abuse@WeProvideConnectivity (and its attendant brethren) did with such
reports.



On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry gave the wrong link
>
> https://github.com/linkedin/lafayette
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We have been doing it for a while now see:
>
> https://github.com/linkedin/lafayette
>
>
> and been pushing for a while for people to do so
>
> It reminds me, when we tried to get internet in Fiji, the result of the
> discussions was to first do a survey to know if Internet would be of any
> value. Needless to say we lost 5 years in adoption, and in Internet time
> this is a lot.
>
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Todd Herr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> I apologize if you're not a member of M3AAWG, but I'm casting a wide net
> for an upcoming M3AAWG activity.
>
>
>


-- 
Todd
703.220.4153
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to