I am of this mindset as well, as a hosting company, we have the occasional 
false negative due to misconfiguration, (pa.gov!) but I can only remember one 
case that a client was having emails rejected to them, and the domain 
administration I reached out to said that it was from a rogue server that was 
not intended for production yet.

Do you feel DMARC will get the traction it needs to increase SPF Deployment?

Jacob Evans

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of John Coutts
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 3:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Disposition none on policy reject when DKIM andSPF 
fail

I happen to agree with J. Gomez. When I publish a policy, I fully expect it to 
be adhered to. I expected the same when SPF was first introduced (I published 
-all), but SPF lacked a feedback mechanism to resolve issues, and people lost 
confidence in it. DMARC has a feedback mechanism, so there is no reason to 
ignore published policy. The responsibility is on me as a sender to use that 
policy properly, and it is the responsibility of the receiver to adhere to the 
published policy while doing their best to report and resolve any issues.

J.A. Coutts

_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

________________________________

This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged. 
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you 
may not use, copy, print or disclose to anyone the message or any information 
contained in the message. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
advise the sender by reply and delete the message. Thank you.


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to