In article <[email protected]> you write: >I happen to agree with J. Gomez. When I publish a policy, I fully expect it to >be >adhered to.
Then you are doomed to a life of frustration and disappointment. There is nothing whatsoever that senders can say that is anything more than a suggestion to recipients. DMARC provides some ways to make the suggestions more plausible than SPF did, but as we've seen there are plenty of reasons for recipients to continue to view such suggestions with considerable scepticism. That is unlikely change. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
