On Friday, March 14, 2014 3:19 AM [GMT+1=CET], Roland Turner wrote:

> On 03/13/2014 05:28 AM, J. Gomez wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:55 AM [GMT+1=CET], Roland Turner
> > wrote: 
> > 
> > > On 03/07/2014 04:54 AM, John Coutts wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I happen to agree with J. Gomez. When I publish a policy, I
> > > > fully expect it to be adhered to.
> > > I hereby publish my policy that John Coutts immediately give me
> > > all of his money (in return for reading this pearl of wisdom, if
> > > you feel the need for some sort of exchange). By John's own
> > > reasoning, I am within 
> > > my rights to fully expect that he will adhere to this and make
> > > payment to me immediately.
> > Sorry, I didn't know we were having a straw man festival here. I'm
> > always late to these parties, they seem to be a load of fun... 
> 
> No sir, this is the reductio-ad-absurdum party at which Mr. Coutts has
> just enjoyed a "when you tell other people what to do with their
> property, astonishingly they are free to choose to ignore you" on the
> rocks, a beverage for which I hear you've recently developed a taste.
> 
> The only straw man festival in the area is the one hosted by yourself;
> it's down the hall and to the left. The "a protocol is only useful if
> people can implement it without thinking about it too much" is popular
> with a twist of self-entitlement, but frankly it's not very good,
> while the "DMARC claims to be the FUSSP" is enjoyed straight up by only the
> most pretentious of festival-goers.

Well, it seems like you are having a blast!

Regards,
J.Gomez


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to