Gents, Perhaps this has been discussed, what about just rewrite "from" header to actual mailing list, so you don't violate DMARC, http://dmarc.org/faq.html#s_3
Best Regards, Jonas Falck CEO & Co-Founder HALON SECURITY INC 100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1080 San Francisco, CA 94104, USA Phone: +1 415.992.5583 Cell: +1.650.445.9076 www.inumbo.com - Enterprise anti-spam/malware/phishing service - no contract, no commitments. www.halonsecurity.com - Award winning security software for datacenter,hosting and service providers. On Apr 8, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Andrew Beverley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 02:36 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> Andrew Beverley skrev den 2014-04-08 17:16: >>> I am inclined to agree, but what is the best solution for this >>> scenario? >> >> solved in exchange to not reply to Precedense: foo header mails >> >> dovecot-lmtp, dovecot-lda, sieve does not do reply based on that, so if >> sieve based vacation is in use it works for maillist atleast, hopefully >> exchange admins can do it aswell or make a bugreport ? > > I was referring to the more general mailing list problem ;-) > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
