The law of internet give and take mandates that people will use technology to the point where any use/effort that doesn't directly help them will not be adopted.
I'm sure that the number of mailbox providers who go through the effort of generating reports vs those who are simply verifying/rejecting wouldn't surprise anyone. On Apr 10, 2014 2:08 PM, "John Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> bounces.) This is the same host that sends list mail from CAUCE and a > >> bunch of other innocuous well behaved lists. If it's not whitelisted, > >> nothing is whitelisted. > > > >This is a big surprise, and leaves me wondering how it is that I'm > >seeing PolicyOverrideReason mailing_list cases for forwarders far > >smaller than yourself. > > Beats me. I've seen them in my DMARC reports on my lists, too, but I > can assure you I got a whole lot of DMARC bounces from multiple > providers whan Yahoo published p=reject. > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
