On 04/09/2014 09:41 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 4/9/2014 2:07 AM, Jonas Falck wrote:
Gents,
Perhaps this has been discussed,
what about just rewrite "from" header to actual mailing list, so you
don't violate DMARC,
http://dmarc.org/faq.html#s_3
What about recipients' not being able to reply directly to the
original author?
Is this actually a sufficiently large concern to worry about? I'm not
saying that it isn't (although the frequent practice of pointing
Reply-To: may suggest that this boat has already sailed), just wondering
whether you have an approach to assessing it.
- Roland
--
Roland Turner | Director, Labs
TrustSphere Pte Ltd | 3 Phillip Street #13-03, Singapore 048693
Mobile: +65 96700022 | Skype: roland.turner
[email protected] | http://www.trustsphere.com/
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
