>It could promote junk address book clutter at webmail providers who >helpful pre-populate your address book based on addresses you've >received messages from or sent messages to. It also looks ugly, >basically unintentional obfuscation.
For once, I agree with Al. (Alert the media!) These addresses will land in people's address books, so list operators will be volunteering to run a permanent forwarding service, unrelated to any mailing list messages. Even worse, those address books will be scraped, and they'll start getting spam, so you'll have to filter them, and probably turn them off if the spam gets too bad and issue new ones the next time the user writes to the list. Of course, if networks that want to publish p=reject policies for their users were to provide such a free service for list operators to use, I might think about it. R's, John PS: It may also infringe the Zoemail patents. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
