I have some insight into what is happening here. L-Soft just updated listserv v 
16 to do exactly what you describe (I belong to L-Soft’s site manager and list 
owner groups). The patch causes listserv to check for a DMARC DNS record, and 
if one exists with p=reject it rewrites the FROM field in the header with what 
you describe. If the originating IP does not have a DMARC record or has one and 
does not have p=reject listserv ignores it. So either Google uses listserv or 
they read the listserv lists also and copied it. 

Either way, it is a very ugly workaround.

best,
Larry

On Apr 25, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Al Iverson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Michael Storz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Interesting, my experience is different. The last example of a From field
>> with an aol.com or yahoo.com domain via googlegroups.com I've seen in my
>> logs is from Apr 22 20:16:33. The first rewritten From field is from Apr 22
>> 18:12:23. But this is only the case for aol.com and yahoo.com, yahoo.de and
>> other yahoo domains without DMARC policy=reject are not rewritten.
> 
> This fits with what I am seeing as well. I tested Google Groups just
> about an hour ago and ended up whipping up a quick blog post about it:
> 
> http://www.spamresource.com/2014/04/google-groups-rewriting-from-addresses.html
> 
> Regards,
> Al Iverson
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
> 
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
> (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

--
Larry Finch
[email protected]



_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to