On Apr 26, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Larry Finch wrote: >> >>> >> It is ugly because it means that different messages with have different >> headers, depending on where the message originated. And it also forces email >> from Yahoo and AOL to have a Reply To that will always go back to the >> original sender rather than the list. Many lists want replies to go to the >> list, not the original sender. >> >> It is also ugly because it changes the way received messages appear from >> what everyone has been expecting for the last 20 years. >> > > Ok... but no uglier than any of the other workarounds that we're being forced > into by p=reject - which is where the real ugliness lies. > I agree with you 100% on that! Best regards Larry -- Larry Finch [email protected]
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
