On 4/27/2014 3:18 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
  It seems to me that, if DMARC is to be
regarded as a serious part of the Internet infrastructure and
operational environment, it's going to be important to develop a
pretty complete and easy to digest description of use cases and
consequences, and to do so quickly.

The draft BCP was/is intended for such an effort:

   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-crocker-dmarc-bcp-03


That the "Action XYZ will be painful if…" document isn't available
seems like a lacuna right now.  That is normal for a pretty new
technology.  I would like to suggest that its development is urgent;

I agree.


d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to