On May 2, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Terry Zink <[email protected]> wrote:

>>> if this maillist here would change i bet it would be more 
>>> understandable on what not to do
> 
>> The advice hasn't changed: don't set a DMARC policy other than p=none on 
>> domains
>> used by human users.  We know that some large domains have disregarded that 
>> advice, but it doesn't make it any less correct.
> 
> I understand this position because it's a position I take many times here at 
> work. However, as has been pointed out to me, just because I am correct 
> doesn't mean that I am right, nor that I don't have a problem to solve.
> 
> Given that large email providers like Yahoo and AOL do publish p=reject 
> records, how is the rest of the email community going to deal mailing lists 
> and other legitimate cases that fail DMARC? It's not enough to say "Yahoo and 
> AOL shouldn't be doing it." That ship has sailed. The question now is what 
> can we do to improve user experience? Several answers have been proposed:
> 
> 1. Do nothing and let domains that publish p=reject live with the consequences
> 2. Don't permit domains with p=reject onto mailing lists
> 3. Mailing lists should reformat the message to prevent DMARC failures
> 4. Email receivers should be selective about how they enforce p=reject - send 
> it to Junk or even skip enforcing it from known good emailing lists
> 5. Extend DMARC so that it supports mailing lists
> 6. Something else?
> 
> These each have their pros and cons but it seems to me that working to 
> support p=reject with mailing lists is a net benefit to everyone.

If it has no negative impact, sure.

If it does have negative impact for elamil users at domains other than those 
publishing p=reject - *especially* negative impact that will last well beyond 
the expected lifetime of DMARC as a useful protocol - expect to get quite a lot 
of pushback on claims that it's a net benefit.

If it "weakens" DMARC significantly expect to get pushback about that, too.

Cheers,
  Steve


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to