>>Because, as the situations currently is, DMARC's p=reject is no more than >>a scoring result to be fed to Spamassassin or whatever milter you use to >>do further processing. > >Have any current supporters changed their implementation to work this way?
It's pretty clear that's what Gmail is doing, probably automatically via the existing software that manages per-user spam filter rules. People have sent me messages sent through mailing lists, with AOL and Yahoo authors and broken DKIM signatures, which went into the spam folder, rather than being rejected. Some people tell me that with sufficient pressing of the Not Spam button and making filter rules you can get them back into the inbox. This is hardly a solution, both because it's utterly undocumented, and it requires a kind of spam filtering that not everyone wants or can afford. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
