On 5/9/14, 9:56 AM, "John R Levine" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> It's pretty clear that's what Gmail is doing, probably automatically >>> via the existing software that manages per-user spam filter rules. >> >> I disagree. What¹s clear is that they implemented the exemption >> conditions as defined in the spec when they initially deployed it years >> ago. > >When Yahoo first published p=reject, Gmail was rejecting mail with >yahoo.com addresses. (We have logs.) Now it mostly goes into the spam >folder. I don't see how an exemption set up a year ago would do that. > >Regards, >John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY >Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. There is a big difference between having an existing exemption process that starts identifying more things due to changes other people make, and changing the way your system works. You are attempting to assert the later about someone else’s system based purely on speculation. I don’t understand why you would try to answer a question that was clearly intended for people who have implementations currently in production when you don’t. Please let people explain how their systems actually work. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
