Google has always overridden DMARC for some mailing lists, a usage which is
explicitly allowed in the DMARC spec. I for one don't find it surprising
that
they added ietf.org -- and presumably some other lists -- to the set of
mailing
lists they do that for after there was worldwide press coverage of this
case.
Elizabeth
[email protected]
On 5/31/14, 1:18 AM, "J. Gomez via dmarc-discuss"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Saturday, May 31, 2014 4:23 AM [GMT+1=CET], Michael Adkins via
>dmarc-discuss wrote:
>
>> We are trying to arrive at the facts of
>> whether or not current implementations have actually made changes, and
>> what the scope of those changes actually are.
>
>What about the change Google made to their systems, in order not to
>reject YAHOO and AOL mail relayed from mailing lists?
>
>To Gmail, it seems DMARC's p=reject now means p=quarantine.
>
>Regards,
>J.Gomez
>
>_______________________________________________
>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
>terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
