On Jun 5, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Les Barstow via dmarc-discuss > <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree - DMARC does not protect against the From description. But if the MUA > were to display the full From header rather than the description only, we > might be getting somewhere. > > The rest of your response backs up my point; the will to get this done > "right" in a broader sense does not exist and we're left with ineffective > band-aids and holes large enough to drive a truck full of phish through. > > +1. Any comprehensive solution to this cluster of problems requires that the > discussion cover everything from the IP layer all the way up through layer 9, > and not punt on any of it. That obviously exceeds the scope of anything > we've tried before, but that doesn't change this ultimate requirement. > As pointed to me, this could be a Wicked Problem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem and be approached as such which is not the type of problem engineers may handle well.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
