Well I just tried to make the email as simple as possible :). Even when
I sent the email with all proper headers it still gets rejected the same
way.
for example this one got rejected as well:
**************************************************************
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from prnk.prnk.cz (prnk.prnk.cz [10.0.2.15])
by prnk.prnk.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E077B2798F69
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:51:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:51:33 +0100 (CET)
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: aaa
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_a1399458-aa36-431b-861a-e927d9c85f0e"
Thread-Index: uTsORSf5VFIl+ac9kFTxbCe3gSuS3w==
Thread-Topic: aaa
--=_a1399458-aa36-431b-861a-e927d9c85f0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
aaa
***************************************************************
<[email protected]>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[64.233.184.27] said:
550-5.7.1 Unauthenticated email from prnk.cz is not accepted due to
domain's 550-5.7.1 DMARC policy. Please contact the administrator of
prnk.cz domain if 550-5.7.1 this was a legitimate mail. Please visit
550-5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/2451690 to learn
about
the 550 5.7.1 DMARC initiative. 203si12899503wme.104 - gsmtp (in
reply to
end of DATA command)
Best Regards
Petr
Dne 08.12.2016 v 12:40 David Woodhouse napsal(a):
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 12:23 +0100, Petr Novák via dmarc-discuss wrote:
thanks for the answer. I tried it with the empty line but the result
is still the same.
Still invalid as it lacks Date: header. And it SHOULD have a Message-Id
header too. And probably other things. ISTR it needs at least one of
Cc: and To: headers too?
But those are also *probably* not relevant. Unless Google is giving
crappy error messages. Nobody ever gives crappy error messages right?
--
dwmw2
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
