In article <he1pr0202mb25859d980340329dee84d978e6...@he1pr0202mb2585.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >John Levine wrote: > >> This would be a good time to reread RFC 7489, particularly section >> 6.6.3, and very particularly numbered item 3 in that section. > >This is simply the DNS record discovery mechanism. It doesn't explain the >apparent overriding of the behaviour of >the sub-domain policy specified in the record discovered via that mechanism.
Hmmn. I wonder if anyone ever tested sp=none. More typically you don't expect your subdomains to be sending mail so it's sp=reject. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
