It may be because a.prnk.cz doesn't has it's own MX record, so GMail assumes somebody is trying to spoof non-mail A records from domain prnk.cz and uses DMARC for this domain. Try to add MX.
08.12.2016 14:59, Petr Novák via dmarc-discuss пишет: > Well I just tried to make the email as simple as possible :). Even > when I sent the email with all proper headers it still gets rejected > the same way. > > for example this one got rejected as well: > ************************************************************** > Return-Path: <[email protected]> > Received: from prnk.prnk.cz (prnk.prnk.cz [10.0.2.15]) > by prnk.prnk.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E077B2798F69 > for <[email protected]>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:51:33 +0100 (CET) > Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:51:33 +0100 (CET) > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Subject: aaa > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="=_a1399458-aa36-431b-861a-e927d9c85f0e" > Thread-Index: uTsORSf5VFIl+ac9kFTxbCe3gSuS3w== > Thread-Topic: aaa > > --=_a1399458-aa36-431b-861a-e927d9c85f0e > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > aaa > *************************************************************** > <[email protected]>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[64.233.184.27] > said: > 550-5.7.1 Unauthenticated email from prnk.cz is not accepted due to > domain's 550-5.7.1 DMARC policy. Please contact the administrator of > prnk.cz domain if 550-5.7.1 this was a legitimate mail. Please visit > 550-5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/2451690 to learn > about > the 550 5.7.1 DMARC initiative. 203si12899503wme.104 - gsmtp (in > reply to > end of DATA command) > > > Best Regards > Petr > > > Dne 08.12.2016 v 12:40 David Woodhouse napsal(a): >> On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 12:23 +0100, Petr Novák via dmarc-discuss wrote: >>> >>> thanks for the answer. I tried it with the empty line but the result >>> is still the same. >> >> Still invalid as it lacks Date: header. And it SHOULD have a Message-Id >> header too. And probably other things. ISTR it needs at least one of >> Cc: and To: headers too? >> >> But those are also *probably* not relevant. Unless Google is giving >> crappy error messages. Nobody ever gives crappy error messages right? >> >> -- >> dwmw2 >> > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note > Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) -- Vladimir Dubrovin @Mail.Ru
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
