I thought that's what the Return-Path: was for. I understand that MLs want to field bounces so they can track and inhibit certain recipients, not to mention shield senders from (possibly very many) bounces in response to a single post. The vacation autoresponses alone can get very tedious very quickly. I'm not clear on how SPF alignment prevents this.
My humblest apologies if you already covered the particulars in an earlier message, and I missed it. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/10/2014 8:59 AM, John Sweet wrote: > >> I see the competing "answers" breaking down differently: >> >> - Mailing list implementation/practice must change to support >> From-header alignment >> > > > Just to be clear, WRT SPF, that means never being able to specify an > address for return notifications, other than the author's address. No > "delegating" the handling of such operational aspects of a message. > > > > d/ > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
