On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Jim Fenton <[email protected]> wrote:
> More broadly: I'm not an expert on IETF publication criteria, but I > hope that, especially given this confusion, controls are in place to > protect against the publication of informational RFCs that might be > harmful in some respect. > I don't think it's a bad idea to publish things that have potentially negative side effects as long as they're well documented. If that's flatly disallowed, then a lot of good but incomplete ideas will never see the light of day. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
