On Apr 10, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Jim Fenton <[email protected]> wrote: > More broadly: I'm not an expert on IETF publication criteria, but I > hope that, especially given this confusion, controls are in place to > protect against the publication of informational RFCs that might be > harmful in some respect. > > I don't think it's a bad idea to publish things that have potentially > negative side effects as long as they're well documented. If that's flatly > disallowed, then a lot of good but incomplete ideas will never see the light > of day. +1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons Matt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
