On 6/8/2014 11:30 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Vlatko Salaj <[email protected]"DMARC participating MTAs SHOULD include Authentication Results for all underlying protocols (SPF/DKIM), as well as such results for DMARC validation itself, among headers of original messages, during DMARC processing, so they are delivered to end user's mailbox with the message. [...] That's interesting. I imagine I assumed they were all (or would all be) doing that already, so it wasn't made explicit. I'm not so sure about the SHOULD because the only interoperability A-R enables is stuff between the verifiers and the MUAs and humans, really. It certainly wouldn't be a bad idea for us to highlight how useful it would be though. It is mentioned in Section 6, but the mention there doesn't even say that it's the DMARC result that's supposed to be recorded. That bit at least needs to be fixed. Anyone else have a comment?
Only that it goes back to the similar SPF thing regarding dynamic rejections. So to be consistent for DMARC:
DMARC POLICY A-R Trace Guideline REJECT --> N/A see 55x reply codes. QUARANTINE --> SHOULD record with A-R. NONE --> SHOULD record with A-R. -- HLS _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
