On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:01 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is a traffic jam in Cambridge/Boston > several times a day as the lifting bridge opens to let some plutocrat > sail his yacht through at rush hour. Several thousand people have to > wait half an hour to get to work for one person to enjoy their hobby. > I think that is a rotten and selfish way to run things. > Chances are that the > conclusion is going to be that NO DMARC WG is formed because the > people using DMARC are not interested in the changes that are going to > be proposed. i just love this, i had to comment. Phillip goes about a story of a bridge and rich, selfish ppl disallowing thousands of workers, and then he mentions how rich [read selfish] corporations don't wanna change DMARC and thus go on affecting thousands of domains... and he doesn't realize the paralel. > So given the fact that DMARC is causing problems for mailing lists we > should not automatically assume that the solution is to change DMARC. DMARC is causing problems for many things, not just mailing lists. otherwise we wouldn't be having 3rd party alignment support proposals. yet we have 3 of them. and it's just beginning. > Though since 'shut > DMARC down because we says to' is not going happen pretty much > anything has a better chance of deployment. well, since we don't have an oracle to ask what will happen to DMARC, i'll rather leave all options open. however, i'm sure not gonna subscribe to this bullying, rich corporation tactic: "we will do what we want, and u can't stop us". either a protocol is for all the ppl, or abandoned by ppl. -- Vlatko Salaj aka goodone http://goodone.tk _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
