On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:15 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:

> Right.  So if you don't want people using unforwarded weak signatures
> for reputation management, you need to put something into them so that
> old clients don't accept them as signatures and ignore the t= tag.
> Either call them something other than DKIM-Signature, or do a version
> bump to v=2.
>

I'm not clear on the case you're describing.  Can you mock up an example?

Also, isn't it "x=" that's interesting here, not "t="?

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to