If a receiver cares about 'strength' (or perhaps robustness) of signatures, they should pay attention to that.
It is my impression that the idea here is that a signature with t= isn't interesting unless there's a matching signature with d=. Or did I misunderstand that.
You are of course correct that senders have always been allowed to create weak signatures, but until now there has been little incentive to do so.
Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
